Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Experimental Results for the PRICAI 2023 Paper ``Detecting AI Planning Modelling Mistakes -- Potential Errors and Benchmark Domains''

Authors: Sleath, Kayleigh; Bercher, Pascal;

Experimental Results for the PRICAI 2023 Paper ``Detecting AI Planning Modelling Mistakes -- Potential Errors and Benchmark Domains''

Abstract

This repository contains data related to the following paper: An overview of which domains have been tested on which software, refer to the following paper: @InProceedings{Sleath2023PossibleModelingErrors, author = {Kayleigh Sleath and Pascal Bercher}, title = {Detecting AI Planning Modelling Mistakes -- Potential Errors and Benchmark Domains}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 20th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2023)}, year = {2023}, publisher = {Springer} } Specifically, it contains: - the benchmarks used in the paper. - screenshots of the output of call commands to the respective software artifacts (the actual call commands are only contained in some of them) - excel tables collecting the results Please note: (1) These benchmark problems are just copied in here for the sake of completeness and transparency. But if you are actually interested in using them, please use the newest version, which might have corrections and additional test cases. You find it here: https://github.com/ProfDrChaos/flawedPlanningModels (2) Please also note that the screenshots of our tests might not perfectly fit the folder structure of our benchmarks because we made some minor restructurings after the paper submission. Specifically, some test cases that we classified as syntactical in the submission were then changed into a semantic ones for the camera-ready version. (Hence the paths in the screenshots or tables might be slightly different.) (3) Also note that by the time you read this, several errors undetected by these systems at the time of the evaluation might be resolved by now. (We included the version numbers of the tested software.)

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 11
    download downloads 1
  • 11
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
11
1