Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Purpose: To evaluate safety and efficacy of intracameral Phenocaine plus as a supplement to conventional topical proparacaine anesthetic drops in cataract surgery. Methods: A prospective and controlled study including 100 patients suffering with bilateral cataract were assigned to 2 different groups for the type of anesthesia received, 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride drops in the first eye, and 0.5% proparacaine drops augmented with intracameral Phenocaine plus in the fellow eye for phacoemulsification surgery . At the end of surgery questionnaire were assigned to patient in both groups indicating the degree of pain (0-3) felt during the surgery. Results: Thirty-six percent of patients in group 1 declared to have not felt any pain against the 84% of patients in group 2. Fifty-six percent of patients in group 1 complained about only a slight discomfort against 16% of group 2 patients. Only a small percentage of patients in group 1 (8%) admitted severe pain, while no patient in group 2 admitted severe pain. Postoperative day 1 unaided visual acuity was in the range of 6/18–6/9 for most of the patients. No adverse event like corneal decompensation or TASS were noted. Two patients in group 2 reported an episode of transient IOP spike, lasting several hours after surgery and 1 patient in group 2 had corneal edema resolving at end of 1 week after surgery Conclusion: Intracameral administration of Phenocaine plus is a safe, simple and readily available method to increase the analgesia and in addition mydriasis during the cataract surgery, eliminating the discomfort and increasing the cooperation of the patients during surgery.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts