Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The ICA standards ISAD(G), ISAAR(CPF), ISDF and ISDIAH were created independently, and it was never defined how exactly they relate to each other. RiC aims to address this and, as a new model, to help contextualise archival records extensively. The provenance principle, with its two aspects of „respects des fonds“ and „respect de l’ordre originel“, was introduced as a generally valid principle of classification for archives. However, today’s reality of record production is so complex that it can no longer be adequately represented by the traditional provenance principle. RiC’s new data model is based on semantic technologies and offers an answer to the challenges. Instead of the mono-hierarchical model of ISAD(G), RiC’s network model allows for several equally valid perspectives on the archival records.
RiC, Records in Contexts
RiC, Records in Contexts
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 29 | |
| downloads | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts