Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Anonymous credentials (ACs) are digital cryptographically-secure versions of paper and digital credentials that let us selectively prove possession of encoded attributes (claims) to verifiers such as digital services, employers, or government departments without disclosing any other information. While attributes by governmental issuers usually reflect basic personal information about the credential holder (e.g., name, gender, age, address), attributes can also reflect more extensive claims about holders, such as the holder’s platform details and configuration. Since the attributes might be sensitive, it is popular to embed additional attributes in the credential about the existing attributes, e.g., that age is above 18, thus allowing a holder to show that their age satisfies some condition without revealing the exact age. However, since each verifier might have different policies that must be satisfied, it is becoming increasingly impractical for issuers to embed all possible claims in a credential. To mitigate this problem and allow arbitrary policies to be checked against individual attributes without complicating or overwhelming the credential, we propose to let verifiers dynamically define policies as high-level programs which can be verifiably executed by holders on their credentials. Furthermore, to mitigate the potential risk of dishonest verifiers attempting to benefit or otherwise leak sensitive information learned through this unlimited expressiveness of policies, we propose making the proofs designated verifier. Thus, any proof produced for one verifier cannot be used to convince another.
First submission version
Designated Verifier, zkSNARKs, Anonymous Credentials
Designated Verifier, zkSNARKs, Anonymous Credentials
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 14 | |
| downloads | 19 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts