{"references": ["1.\tMiles, D. A. (2017, August). A taxonomy of research gaps: Identifying and defining the seven research gaps. In Doctoral student workshop: finding research gaps-research methods and strategies, Dallas, Texas (pp. 1-15).", "2.\tRobinson, K. A., Saldanha, I. J., & Mckoy, N. A. (2011). Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 64(12), 1325-1330.", "3.\tMacintosh, A., Coleman, S., & Schneeberger, A. (2009, September). eParticipation: The research gaps. In International conference on electronic participation (pp. 1-11). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.", "4.\tRyan, C., Korman, N. J., Gelfand, J. M., Lim, H. W., Elmets, C. A., Feldman, S. R., ... & Menter, A. (2014). Research gaps in psoriasis: opportunities for future studies. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 70(1), 146-167."]}

Research gaps play a crucial role in driving the advancement of knowledge and identifying areas where further investigation is needed. "Mind the Gap: A Succinct Exploration of Research Gap Types" provides an overview of different types of research gaps and their significance in the research landscape. It covers methodological, theoretical, empirical, literature review, practical, interdisciplinary, and ethical research gaps. The paper serves as a comprehensive resource for researchers, emphasizing the importance of addressing these gaps to contribute to the growth and development of knowledge.