Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RAPID SARS COV 2 ANTIGEN DETECTION TEST & REAL TIME PCR TEST FOR DIAGNOSIS OF COVID-19 IN TERTIARY CARE INSTITUTE AT KOTA, SOUTH–EAST RAJASTHAN, INDIA

Authors: Harshad Singh Naruka , Dinesh Verma , Preetam Singh Mandawat and Bhupendra Kumar Mandawat;

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RAPID SARS COV 2 ANTIGEN DETECTION TEST & REAL TIME PCR TEST FOR DIAGNOSIS OF COVID-19 IN TERTIARY CARE INSTITUTE AT KOTA, SOUTH–EAST RAJASTHAN, INDIA

Abstract

Background:The 2019 (Covid19) pandemic of coronavirus disease was caused by SARS Cov 2 Virus. The emergence of the disease was started from the Wuhan city of China in December 20191. This infection causes asymptomatic and mild diseases more than severe pneumonia. A Rapid Lateral flow immunoassays using monoclonal anti-SARS CoV- 2 antibodies, targeting SARS-CoV-2 antigens, can be used as complementary screening tests if their accuracy comes comparable to that of gold standard real-time RT-PCR assays. Objective:The present study has been conducted retrospectively on the data of patients who underwent for Covid 19 diagnosis by RAT at the Microbiology Department Central Laboratory, Maharao Bhim Singh Hospital Nayapura Kota. Material and Method: Respiratory samples from suspected 5219 COVID-19 patients, mainly nasopharyngeal and throat swabs were collected. COVID-19 Ag Confirmit™ kit (Alpine biomedicals) is a rapidchromatographic immunoassay for the detection ofSARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein (N) antigen in respiratoryspecimens. Multiplex Real-time RT-PCR kit (TRIVITRON healthcare) was used, whichtargets envelope gene (E), and Orf1ab gene of SARS-CoV-2 genome and RPP30 Human gene as internal control, was used for SARS-CoV-2RNA detection. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the usefulness of rapid diagnostic tests. For that online MedCalcs Diagnostic test evaluation statistical tool10. Result: Among all 5219 samples (n=5219) tested by RT-PCR 785 (15.4%) samples were positive and 4434 (84.95%) were negative. Samples tested by RAT 813 (15.57%) samples were positive & 4406 (84.42%) were negative, in our study we found discordant results in 36 samples. The sensitivity and specificity of the COVID-19 Ag Confirmit™ kit (Alpine biomedicals) were 99.49% and 99.28% respectively. Discussion: Out of 785 RT-PCR-positive samples in our study, the 4 false negative results were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antigen seven days after disease onset. The RT-PCR result of these samples had relatively high Ct-values. Without the present population prevalence of COVID-19, the positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of the assay could not be accurately calculated. Conclusions: There is comparable Sensitivity and Specificity between Rapid assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection (COVID-19 Ag Confirmit™ kit) and real-time RT-PCR assay.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 29
    download downloads 9
  • 29
    views
    9
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
29
9
Green