Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Image registration is a crucial step in interferometric synthetic aperature radar (InSAR) and in SAR tomography. Generally, a displacement of the sensors, e.g. due to different flight tracks,causes an image distortion that is dependent on the terrain height that is being observed. While ground truth digital elevation map (DEM) data are often available to roughly compensate this distortion, there are application scenarios where the acquisition paths are too irregular or DEMs are not available. In such cases, image registration via image processing is a suitable choice. While the SAR community prefers patch-based correlation techniques, the computer vision community has investigated the same issue from technically different points of view. In this article, we study the performance of correlation- and computer vision-based image registration techniques for the image registration problem in SAR, in particular in airborne SAR without ground truth. We show that computer vision algorithms can outperform correlation-based techniques.
Image Registration, Optical Flow, Computer Vision, Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar
Image Registration, Optical Flow, Computer Vision, Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 27 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts