Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

RISK FACTORS FOR REFRACTORY BENIGN ESOPHAGEAL STRICTURES

Authors: A. Sair , S. Mrabti , A. Benhamdane , T. Addajou , R. Berraida , S. Sentissi , F. Rouibaa , A. Benkirane and H. Seddik;

RISK FACTORS FOR REFRACTORY BENIGN ESOPHAGEAL STRICTURES

Abstract

Background: The management of patients with refractory benign esophageal stricture is time-consuming and challenging. Dilation is the classic treatment for esophageal strictures, expressed primarily as dysphagia, which can significantly impair quality of life.Our objective is to report the results of dilatation, as well as the different risk factors of refractory benign esophageal strictures. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study. Thirty-three patients with benign esophageal strictures were treated by dilation between 2016 and 2021. Refractory stenosis was defined as the inability to maintain esophageal caliber at 14 mm diameter over 5 dilatation sessions, or the inability to maintain satisfactory luminal diameter for 4 weeks once a 14 mm diameter was achieved. Results: 12 patients had refractory strictures. All patients had dysphagia.After univariate analysis, refractory strictures were associated with the presence of a peptic stenosis (p=0.002) and dilatations of caliber less than 16 mm (p=0.012), after multivariate analysis only peptic stenosis was associated with refractory stenosis (p=0.034). Conclusion: In our series, refractory stenosis was present in 38.7%. Peptic stenosis was statistically significantly associated with refractory esophageal stenosis.

Keywords

Esophageal Strictures Dilation Refractory Strictures

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
    download downloads 6
  • 6
    views
    6
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
6
6
Green