Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Even well-known and respected leaders in proteomics agree that it lies 10 years behind genomics. There are several valid reasons for this, including the chemistry of proteins, the technical complexity of the instrumentation (in particular mass-spectrometry - MS) and the vast possibilities in the study of proteins. An often overseen albeit essential component of this failure is arguably the software that is promoted inside the proteomics community. Computational proteomics researchers who value quality software, comprehensive data analysis and reproducible research ought to illustrate how more flexible and advanced tools can effectively be used and demonstrate their advantages. Here, we illustrate some examples of proteomics data analysis in R, in particular low level raw MS data manipulation, labelled and label-free quantitation and peptide identification, taken from the RforProteomics package.
Poster presented at the Bioconductor conference, Seattle, 2013.
proteomics, Bioconductor, bioinformatics, mass spectrometry
proteomics, Bioconductor, bioinformatics, mass spectrometry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts