Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Background: Current era of minimally invasive surgery and awake craniotomy has created revived attention towards scalp blocks and its benefits. Present study was conducted to evaluate and compare effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in scalp block for supratentorial craniotomy surgery. Methods: The prospective, comparative, randomized study was conducted by Department of Anaesthesia at J.J. Hospital and Grant Medical College, Mumbai, India. Data was collected between September 2018 to August 2020. Adult subjects between 18 years and 60 years (both inclusive) of either gender with ASA-I, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 15, and indicated to undergo supratentorial craniotomy surgeries were enrolled. One study group received 1 mcg/kg Clonidine, while other 1 mcg/kg Dexmedetomidine, both diluted with normal saline. Hemodynamic parameters, analgesic requirement and Ramsay Sedation score (RSS) were assessed. Results: 60 patients (30 in each group) were enrolled. Mean age, baseline weight, gender distribution and duration of surgery were statistically comparable between study groups (P>0.05). Mean blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and heart rate were significantly higher in the clonidine group at the time of pin insertion, incision and during most of the intraoperative period (p<0.05). RSS was comparable between study groups at all time-points (p>0.05). Analgesic requirement was overall higher in clonidine group, indicating better analgesia with Dexmedetomidine. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine led to lesser vascular parameters changes, with lower analgesic requirement versus clonidine however, sedation scores were comparable.
Dexmedetomidine Clonidine Bupivacaine Scalp Block Craniotomy
Dexmedetomidine Clonidine Bupivacaine Scalp Block Craniotomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 9 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts