Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Code The file hoeft-et-al-icaps2023-code.zip contains our modified version of the Scorpion planner (https://github.com/jendrikseipp/scorpion) which in turn is based on the Fast Downward planning system (http://fast-downward.org). The eager and lazy SPhO implementation is found under "src/search/operator_counting/pho_abstraction_constraints.{h,cc}". In particular, our configurations use the CPLEX 20.1 LP solver (https://www.ibm.com/academic/home). Detailed instructions for compiling the planner can be found online (http://www.fast-downward.org) and for adding the LP support in the file "LPBuildInstructions - Fast Downward Homepage.pdf". To run the configurations used in the paper run: ./fast-downward.py PDDL_TASK --search $configuration where $configuration is: Eager SPhO: "astar(operatorcounting([pho_abstraction_constraints([projections(systematic(2,interesting_general))],strategy=always)],cache_lp=False,debug_cache=False))" Lazy SPhO eqdist: "astar(operatorcounting([pho_abstraction_constraints([projections(systematic(2,interesting_general))],strategy=tuple)],cache_lp=True,debug_cache=False))" Lazy SPhO grouped: "astar(operatorcounting([pho_abstraction_constraints([projections(systematic(2,interesting_general))],strategy=max_cluster)],cache_lp=True,debug_cache=False))" Lazy SPhO range: "astar(operatorcounting([pho_abstraction_constraints([projections(systematic(2,interesting_general))],strategy=range_sa)],cache_lp=True,debug_cache=False))" Lazy SPhO percent: "astar(operatorcounting([pho_abstraction_constraints([projections(systematic(2,interesting_general))],strategy=percent_sa)],cache_lp=True,debug_cache=False))" offline SPhO: "astar(pho_offline([projections(systematic(2,interesting_general))],max_optimization_time=0,max_time=200))" Benchmarks The file ipc-benchmarks-optimal-strips-1998-2018.zip contains the STRIPS PDDL benchmarks from sequential optimization tracks of IPC 1998-2018. Experiment Data: The remaining zipfiles contain the raw experiment data (raw-runs), parsed values and basic reports (parsed-report) for the experiments in the paper. The code directories and benchmark files have been removed to avoid duplication and to save space.
This work was partially supported by TAILOR, a project funded by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 952215, and by the Wallenberg AI, Autonomous Systems and Software Program (WASP) funded by the Knut and Al- ice Wallenberg Foundation. The computations were enabled by re- sources provided by the National Academic Infrastructure for Su- percomputing in Sweden (NAISS) and the Swedish National Infras- tructure for Computing (SNIC), partially funded by the Swedish Re- search Council through grant agreements no. 2022-06725 and no. 2018-05973.
Classical Planning, Linear Programming
Classical Planning, Linear Programming
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 12 | |
| downloads | 11 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts