Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Alchemical free energy methods have found tremendous success over the last few decades, becoming key components of drug discovery pipelines. Despite many and ongoing innovations in this area, with several methodological improvements published each year, it remains challenging to consistently run free energy campaigns using state-of-the-art tools and best practices. In many cases, doing so requires expert knowledge, and/or the use of expensive closed source software. The Open Free Energy Consortium (https://openfree.energy/) was created with the aim of addressing these issues. A joint effort between academic and industry partners, the consortium aims to create and maintain reproducible and extensible open source toolkits for running large scale free energy campaigns. The initial flagship product of the Open Free Energy Consortium is the OpenFE toolkit (https://github.com/OpenFreeEnergy/openfe/), a permissively licensed open-source Python framework to setup, calculate, and analyse relative binding free energies. In this contribution we will summarise the progress and outputs of the project after its first year of operation. First we present the first benchmark results of the OpenFE toolkit. We compare the accuracy of ΔΔG estimates for approximately 200 ligand transformations calculated using the OpenFE toolkit with the OpenMM molecular dynamics engine, against previously published benchmark systems. We also assess the relative compute performance and accuracy of various equilibrium and non-equilibrium methods, including Hamiltonian replica exchange, self-adjusted mixture sampling, and non-equilibrium switching. Finally, we detail next steps for the toolkit, including the addition of support for other molecular dynamics engines, absolute binding free energies, and the ongoing curation of protein-ligand free energy benchmarks.
Presented at the Ninth Joint Sheffield Conference on Chemoinformatics
open source, free energy calculations
open source, free energy calculations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 31 | |
| downloads | 23 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts