Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

THE IMPACT OF DISCOURSE MARKERS ON THE READABILITY OF NEWS MEDIA ARTICLES VERSUS ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA ARTICLES

Authors: Ahmad Kasem Haj Ali;

THE IMPACT OF DISCOURSE MARKERS ON THE READABILITY OF NEWS MEDIA ARTICLES VERSUS ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA ARTICLES

Abstract

References: 1. Aijmer, Karin. "English discourse particles." English Discourse Particles 2002: 1-315. 2. Brinton, Laurel J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. Lexicalization and language change. Cam-bridge University Press, 2005. 3. Di Ferrante, Laura. "Transitioning between small talk and work talk through discourse mark-ers: Evidence from a workplace spoken corpus." (2021): 7-30. 4. Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (1997). Analyzing casual conversation. Cassell. 5. Faisal, Wafaa Mokhlos. "The Discourse Marker (Well) in Selected Talk Shows: A Discourse Analysis Study1." 6. Fraser, Bruce. "An approach to discourse markers." Journal of pragmatics 14.3 (1990): 383-398. 7. Greenfield, Jerry. "Readability formulas for EFL." JALT Journal 26.1 (2004): 5-24. 8. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. "Learning how to mean." Foundations of language development. Academic Press, 1975. 239-265. 9. Jiang, Lianjiang, and Michelle Mingyue Gu. "Understanding youths' civic participation online: a digital multimodal composing perspective." Learning, Media and Technology 47.4 (2022): 537-556. 10. Jiang, Lianjiang, and Michelle Mingyue Gu. "Understanding youths' civic participation online: a digital multimodal composing perspective." Learning, Media and Technology 47.4 (2022): 537-556. 11. Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your p's and q's. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 292-305. 12. Nilsson, Bo, and Eric Carlsson. "Swedish politicians and new media: Democracy, identity and populism in a digital discourse." New Media & Society 16.4 (2014): 655-671. 13. Pedroni, Marco. "Two decades of fashion blogging and influencing: A critical over-view." Fashion Theory (2022): 1-32. 14. Rhee, Seongha. "On determinants of discourse marker functions: Grammaticalization and discourse-analytic perspectives." Linguistic Research 37.2 (2020): 289-325. 15. Rone, Julia. "Far right alternative news media as 'indignation mobilization mechanisms': how the far right opposed the Global Compact for Migration." Information, Communication & Socie-ty 25.9 (2022): 1333-1350. 16. Schiffrin, Deborah. "Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context." The handbook of discourse analysis (2005): 54-75. 17. Schiffrin, Deborah. Discourse markers. No. 5. Cambridge University Press, 1987. 18. Schourup, L. (1985). Common discourse particles in English conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. 19. Shirazi, Farid. "Social media and the social movements in the Middle East and North Afri-ca: A critical discourse analysis." Information Technology & People (2013).Schourup, L. (1985). Com-mon discourse particles in English conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cali-fornia, Los Angeles. 20. Tagliamonte, Sali A. Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 21. Uzunoğlu, Ebru, and Sema Misci Kip. "Brand communication through digital influencers: Leveraging blogger engagement." International journal of information management 34.5 (2014): 592-602.

Abstract The use of language by the media to affect the views and preferences of viewers is something that may be decoded by examining the pragmatic functions performed by the various discourse markers. The purpose of this study is to investigate the persuasive applications of discourse markers in the media as well as the pragmatism of their application in this environment. We are going to look at the many sorts of discourse markers that are employed in the media to influence the viewpoint of an audience, and then we are going to explore what this implies for the discourse of the media as a whole.

Related Organizations
Keywords

1. readability,2. DMs,3. Media Articles,4. Entertainment,5. Frequency,6. Correlation,7. Author's Style,8. Positive & Negative,9. Tone,10. Interpretation,11. Objectivity,12. Neutrality & Biased,13. Cul-ture,14. Evolution,15. Opinion transmission,16. Attitude., 1. readability,2. DMs,3. Media Articles,4. Entertainment,5. Frequency,6. Correlation,7. Author's Style,8. Positive & Negative,9. Tone,10. Interpretation,11. Objectivity,12. Neutrality & Biased,13. Cul-ture,14. Evolution,15. Opinion transmission,16. Attitude.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 7
    download downloads 7
  • 7
    views
    7
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
7
7
Green