{"references": ["\u00c1lvarez Carlos (2003). \u00abAcerca de las parejas incongruentes y las figuras sim\u00e9tricas\u00bb. Cr\u00edtica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosof\u00eda. Vol. 35, No. 104 (agosto 2003): pp. 31\u201368.", "\u00c1lvarez Carlos (2004). \u00abKant, la geometr\u00eda y el espacio\u00bb. Revista Digital Universitaria 5(11), pp. 1-14.", "Alves, Pedro (2010). Fenomenolog\u00eda del tiempo y de la percepci\u00f3n, Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva. Trad. Francisco Conde Soto.", "Behnke, Elizabeth (1996). \u00abEdmund Husserl\u00b4s Contributions to Phenomenology of the Body in Ideas II\u00bb En: Contributions to Phenomenology. Issues in Husserl\u00b4s Ideas II, editado por Thomas Nenony Lester Embree Vol. 47, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer, pp. 135-160.", "Bennett, J. (1970). \u00abThe Difference between Right and Left\u00bb. American Philosophical Quarterly 7, pp. 175-191.", "Claesges, Ulrich (1964). Edmund Husserls Theorie der Raumkonstitution, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.", "Ducros, Par Paul, (2007). \u00abLa Terre: La th\u00e9orie du g\u00e9ostatisme d'Edmund Husserl\u00bb. Bulletin d'analyse ph\u00e9nom\u00e9nologique III 5, pp. 1-88.", "Husserl, E. (1973). Ding und Raum. Vorlesungen 1907. Hrsg. von Ulrich Claesges, Boston/Londres: Martinus Nijhoff,. [Hua XVI]", "Husserl, E. (2006). La tierra no se mueve. Trad., y notas de Agust\u00edn Serrano de Haro, Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.", "Kant, I. (1900-ss). Kants gesammelte Schriften [ak.]. Hrsg. Koeniglichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 29 vols. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.", "Kant, I. (1992). Op\u00fasculos de filosof\u00eda natural. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.", "Kant, I. (2005). C\u00f3mo orientarse en el pensamiento. Buenos Aires: Quadrata.", "Oro\u00f1o, M. H. (2017). Las contrapartidas incongruentes y el cuerpo propio en el idealismo trascendental de Kant. Ideas y Valores, 66 (163), pp. 153-176.", "Passos Severo, R. (2005). \u00abThree Remarks on the Interpretation of Kant on Incongruent Counterparts\u00bb. Kantian Review 9, pp. 30-57. doi: 10.1017/S1369415400001990", "Richir, Marc (2013). \u00abGeometr\u00eda quirial y constituci\u00f3n del espacio\u00bb. Eikasia, No 47, pp. 743-748.", "Robinson, H. (1981). \u00abIncongruent Counterparts and the Refutation of Idealism\u00bb. Kant-Studien 72.1-4, pp. 391-397. doi: 10.1515/kant.1981.72.1-4.39", "Rukgaber, Matthew S. (2016). \u00abThe Asymmetry of Space: Kant's Theory of Absolute Space in 1768\u00bb. Kantian Review, 21, 3, pp. 415\u2013435", "Rusnock, P., and George, R., (1995). \u00abA Last Shot at Kant and Incongruent Counterparts\u00bb. Kant- Studien 86.3, p. 257-277. doi: 10.1515/kant.1995.86.3.257", "Van Cleve, James y Frederick, Robert E., (1991). The philosophy of right and left. Incongruent Counterparts and the Nature of Space. Dordrecht: Springer.", "Waldorf, D. (2001). \u00abTowards an Interpretation of Kant's 1768 Gegenden im Raume Essay\u00bb. Kant- Studien 92.4, pp. 407-439. doi: 10.1515/kant.2001.002", "Zerbudis, E. (2012). \u00abIncongruent Counterparts and the Origin of Kant's Distinction between Sensibility and Understanding\u00bb. Archiv f\u00fcr Geschichte der Philosophie 94.3, pp. 326-352. doi: 10.1515/agph-2012-0014"]}

Kant, in his precritical writing Von dem ersten Grunde des Unterschiedes der Gegenden im Raume (1768), makes a remarkable effort to show that the reality proper to the concept of space is related to the live body itself as a system of orientation that would correspond, to some way, to the Husserlian characterization of the Leib as absolute here. Indeed, it is possible to find in Kantian argumentation the idea that we can only distinguish the directions of space insofar as these are determined concerning the sides of our live body. In this work, I will present a phenomenological approximation or reading on this very brief dissertation emphasizing the “own reality” of space and its relationship with our corporality, in other words, between the complementarity of the living own body (Leib) with space.