Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Background: The importance of Diversity in Data was highlighted by the UK Health Data Research Alliance (The Alliance). It was acknowledged that improving data quality and increasing representativeness of data used for research and innovation is crucial for both custodians/collectors of data and researchers, to ensure that research is of high quality and based on complete data with the ultimate aim of improving patient outcomes. A working group was set up to discuss, understand and potentially address concerns relevant to the quality of available data, missingness, accessibility and harmonisation of data, which can hinder the reliability of scientific insights. While there are many different aspects to consider within the diversity data field, this working group focuses on challenges and opportunities in the use of data reporting ethnicity. To start the conversations, we are convening the community to share insights from ongoing work and understand the gaps that should still be addressed. This workshop report summarise the main points highlighted during the meeting
Data Science, Data Standards, Health Data, Health Inequalities, Ethnicity Coding, Data Quality, Ethnicity Data
Data Science, Data Standards, Health Data, Health Inequalities, Ethnicity Coding, Data Quality, Ethnicity Data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 20 | |
| downloads | 20 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts