Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Design Considerations for Technical Interoperability in EOSC

Authors: George Kakaletris; Eva Sciacca; Jean-Karim Hériché; Wim Hugo; Emanouil Atanasso; Svetlozar Yordanov;

Design Considerations for Technical Interoperability in EOSC

Abstract

This document is one of the deliverables of the EOSC Association (EOSC-A) Task Force on “Technical Interoperability of Data and Services”. Its main aim is to highlight a number of design principles and suggestions that increase interoperability and composability opportunities for data, software and services, and it is intended to complement the forthcoming Task Force deliverable entitled, "A landscape overview of the EOSC Interoperability Framework: Capabilities and Gaps". The document introduces design-stage principles, both architectural and non-architectural, that are commonly met in software design and maintenance best practices, but are in this case approached from the perspective of EOSC’s technical interoperability. These 21 principles are additionally catalogued in Annex A in tabular form including the guidelines and recommendations of this report, together with the suggested criteria for satisfying the respective principles. The document then proceeds to specify suggestions for the interoperability of EOSC services, addressing the pillars of Open Science, Cloud Computing and the User. The role of standards, as the cornerstone of system interoperability, is presented briefly, and Annex B contains an evidence-based enumeration of the relevant specifications. In the Annex, an indicative list of standard families, along with sources where common standards are drawn for EOSC services, is presented. In conclusion, a set of key points is summarised, that emphasises the need to adopt an interoperability strategy at the time of design of a given system.

Keywords

EOSC, Design Considerations, Technical Interoperability

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 102
    download downloads 89
  • 102
    views
    89
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
102
89
Green
Related to Research communities