Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This CATMA (Computer Assisted Text Markup and Analysis) workshop is intended for users with some preliminary experience with manual digital annotation who (want to) operate with larger amounts of annotation data in the context of their own work or research projects. It will demonstrate the basic features of CATMA and how annotation data can be processed using either the Python package GitMA (Vauth et al. 2021) or the web-based visualization tool vis-À-vis (Münz-Manor et al. 2020). The workshop will provide answers to questions like: How do I access my CATMA annotation data via GitMA? How do I calculate the agreement between multiple annotators? How do I generate advanced visualizations of the texts and annotations in vis-À-vis? How do I visualize collaboratively created annotation data stored in multiple collections?
Paper, Pre-Conference Workshop and Tutorial, and methods, History, Literary studies, analysis, Annotation, inter-annotator-agreement, systems, annotation structures, Cultural studies, collaboration, visualization
Paper, Pre-Conference Workshop and Tutorial, and methods, History, Literary studies, analysis, Annotation, inter-annotator-agreement, systems, annotation structures, Cultural studies, collaboration, visualization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 15 | |
| downloads | 15 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts