Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Following the approach for the datasets in 2013 (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.988754), 2014 (https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1378610.v14) and 2015 (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3180166), the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) is making the publication costs spent in 2016 (esp. for Open Access) publically available. The dataset includes payments for publications of authors funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) via following programmes: Peer-Reviewed Publications: https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwf-programmes/peer-reviewed-publications/ Stand-Alone Publications: https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwf-programmes/stand-alone-publications/
Open Access, Open Science, Publication Costs, Library Studies, Article Processing Charges (APC), Academic Publishing, Scholarly Communication
Open Access, Open Science, Publication Costs, Library Studies, Article Processing Charges (APC), Academic Publishing, Scholarly Communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 89 | |
| downloads | 21 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts