Supplementary Material for "We Feel Like We're Winging It:" A Study on Navigating Open-Source Dependency Abandonment

Name: Supplementary Material for "We Feel Like We're Winging It:" A Study on Navigating Open-Source Dependency Abandonment
Keywords: software engineering, open source software, dependency management, open source sustainability

Miller, Courtney; Kästner, Christian; Vasilescu, Bogdan

Found an issue? Give us feedback

ZENODOarrow_drop_down

ZENODO

Article . 2023

License: CC BY

Data sources: Datacite

ZENODO

Article . 2023

License: CC BY

Data sources: Datacite

Supplementary Material for "We Feel Like We're Winging It:" A Study on Navigating Open-Source Dependency Abandonment

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 30 Jun 2023Publisher:Zenodo

Authors: Miller, Courtney; Kästner, Christian; Vasilescu, Bogdan;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8102546 , 10.5281/zenodo.8102547

Supplementary Material for "We Feel Like We're Winging It:" A Study on Navigating Open-Source Dependency Abandonment

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This replication package contains the interview guide used for the paper "We Feel Like We're Winging It:" A Study on Navigating Open-Source Dependency Abandonment (ESEC/FSE 2023) along with a table with summary statistics for the interviewees. intervieweeSummaryTable.pdf is a table with the summary statistics for the 33 interview participants. interviewGuide.pdf is the final iteration of the interview guide used for the semi-structured exploratory interviews. For more details on the interview protocol and sampling method please see Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the paper pre-print here.

Related Organizations

Carnegie Mellon University
United States

Keywords

software engineering, open source software, dependency management, open source sustainability

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average