Downloads provided by UsageCounts
A deterministic Weather Research and Forecasting model version 4.2 forecast of heavy convective rainfall associated with the passage of the African Easterly Wave (AEW) within the period 23rd-26th August 2017 over Nigeria. The model was setup to perform two nested domain simulations with 18 (parent domain), 6 and 2 km (hereafter WRF18, WRF6 and WRF2) horizontal resolutions. The outer domain covers West Africa and the innermost domain, which runs at convection-permitting scale, focuses on Nigeria. When interpreting the results, it is worthy of note that the data has been regridded to 18 km, which is 3 x the grid scale for WRF6 and 9 x the grid scale for WRF2. This means that there is a fair degree of smoothing that has been applied using a bilinear regridding process to get the models onto a level playing field. Only WRF18 retains its native grid and has not benefited from any additional smoothing. The WRF model setup is similar to the study of Gbode et al. (2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2538-x) in terms of the model physics combination used in the model simulations. The parameterization schemes used are the Goddard (GD) WRF model microphysics (MP), the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ) planetary boundary layer (PBL) and the Bett-Miller-Janjic (BMJ) cumulus convection (CU) parameterization schemes. This combination was found to reproduce realistic rainfall and temperature relative to gridded observations over West Africa. The GD is a six-class microphysics with graupel and modifications for ice/water saturation. MYJ is a local closure scheme that predicts turbulent kinetic energy and the BMJ CU is a profile adjustment scheme that relaxes both deep and shallow profiles toward a reference profile without explicit updraft, downdraft, or cloud entrainment. However, the CU scheme was turned off in the 2 km domain to explicitly represent convection.
WRF, West Africa, Nigeria, Forecast, Heavy Rainfall
WRF, West Africa, Nigeria, Forecast, Heavy Rainfall
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 20 | |
| downloads | 140 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts