Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Image . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
 View all 2 versions
Claim

Levels of Participation in Research and Innovation

appsOther research productkeyboard_double_arrow_right Image 29 Jun 2023 English Publisher:ZenodoFunded by:EC | PRO-Ethics
Authors: Schuerz;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8096864 , 10.5281/zenodo.8096863

Levels of Participation in Research and Innovation

Abstract

Building on the theoretical and visualization work done by Arnstein (1969), Metcalfe (2014), and Kaisler & Missbach (2019), among others, this graph shows the different intensities of participation in research and innovation, and the level of empowerment they provide participants with. Inspirations include: Arnstein, S.R., 1969. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. J. Am. Inst. Plann. 35, pp. 216–224. Metcalfe, J., 2014. The theory needed to support science communication practice. Kaisler, R., Missbach, B., 2019. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT IN RESEARCH - A "HOW TO" GUIDE FOR RESEARCHERS. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5017791 Berditchevskaia, A., Peach, K., and Malliaraki, E. (2021). Participatory AI for humanitarian innovation: a briefing paper. London: Nesta. This graph was developed in the context of the H2020 project PRO-Ethics. 

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 17
  • 17
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
17