
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This figure broadly sketches the cycle of research and innovation funding from the perspective of funding agencies (RFOs). Depending on the specific workflows and regulatory framework within which an RFO operates, some steps may have greater weight or overlap with others. For instance, strategy development and program development might go hand in hand, while a program evaluation might inform the development of a new program without the development of a new strategy. As an output developed in the context of the H2020 project PRO-Ethics, the graph showcases where within an R&I funding cycle participatory engagement may be undertaken.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 18 | |
downloads | 2 |