Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Research Software Workshop: Guidelines and Metrics for Metadata Curation

Authors: Gruenpeter, Morane; Chue Hong, Neil; Granger, Sabrina; Breitmoser, Elena; Priddy, Mike; Antonioletti, Mario; Martinez, Paula Andrea; +3 Authors

Research Software Workshop: Guidelines and Metrics for Metadata Curation

Abstract

The Research Software workshop, was a co-located event with the RDA plenary. Organized by the FAIR-IMPACT European project, with the contribution of the FAIRCORE4EOSC European project. The workshop goals were: Identifying what we have - what is the current landscape of guidelines and metrics for Research Software; Discussing what we need - what are the needs that can be provided by infrastructures and research support staff; Planning how we create adapted guidelines and metrics to the current reality and how we improve the scholarly ecosystem. During the workshop we received valuable feedback which will impact the expected deliverables by the two European projects: FAIR-IMPACT: D4.4 - Guidelines for recommended metadata standard for research software within EOSC FAIR-IMPACT: D5.2 - Metrics for automated FAIR software assessment in a disciplinary context We strive that this process will be as transparent as possible and will yield a result which will be useful for the community and for the service providers that handle research software or act in the scholarly ecosystem, this is why the full planning of the workshop is now made available on Zenodo. We invited the participants to prepare for the session by reviewing the following publications: the SIRS report recommendations, the FAIR4RS principles the CodeMeta initiative vocabulary The authors of this repository are the organizing committee of the workshop and the contributors in this repository are the participants of the workshop onsite and online.

Keywords

Metadata guidelines, FAIR metrics, FAIR4RS, SIRS, Research software

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 43
    download downloads 43
  • 43
    views
    43
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
43
43
Related to Research communities