Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

SABYDOMA's 2nd Legal Workshop on Safe-by-Design (SbD)

Authors: Anthony Bochon; Andrew Nelson; Hubert Rauscher; Muhammad Nizam Awang; Paul V. Majkowski; Leonie Reins; Dalila Antunes; +1 Authors

SABYDOMA's 2nd Legal Workshop on Safe-by-Design (SbD)

Abstract

On Monday 5th June 2023, the EU H2020 project SABYDOMA organised its 2nd Legal Workshop on Safe-by-Design (SbD), on the first day of the nanoSAFE2023 conference in Grenoble, France. While the by-design paradigm now seems to be integrated into regulatory policies, legal challenges have yet to be addressed. This workshop is the first to focus on potential liability issues (Asia/EU/US) and the global regulatory dimension of the by-design approach. With expert lawyers and scientists from different regions of the world among the speakers, the workshop covered the legal aspects of the SSbD approach in the nanotechnology sector, expanding out to “by-design” approaches relevant in other technological industries. The main objective of the workshop was to have a better understanding of the potential legal consequences of the adoption of the SSbD recommendation by the European Commission on 8th December 2022 and, in particular, whether it could prompt a change in the liability regimes which are currently centered on the manufacturers’ liability and not on the “designers” of technologies. Around 50 participants from all over the world (one third in person and two-thirds on online); with a majority of female participants, from a wide range of stakeholders (scientists, industry, consultants, market researchers, NGO representatives, regulators, policy makers/advisors, lawyers, etc.), joined the workshop. After a warm welcome to the workshop by the moderator Mr Anthony Bochon, from Gil Robles – San Bartolome & Partners (Brussels), SABYDOMA’s coordinator, Prof. Andrew Nelson, from the University of Leeds, and Ignasi Gispert Pi, from APPNPS (Spain), presented SABYDOMA’s key findings towards a better understanding of the SSbD paradigm. Hubert Rauscher, representing the European Commission JRC, then talked about the recommendation of the EC on SSbD. Dr Muhammad Nizam Awang (Universiti Sains Islam), Paul V. Majkowski (Rivkin Radler LLP / New York and New Jersey bars) and Anthony Bochon followed with talks about the Asian, American and EU perspectives on liability and the by-design paradigm. Our last speaker, Leonie Reins (Erasmus University Rotterdam), gave an insight of the SSbD concept as a regulatory approach. The workshop ended with a very interactive Round Table discussion where our four panellists (Andrew Nelson, Ignasi Gispert, Dalila Antunes (from Factor Social), and Hubert Rauscher) were interviewed by the moderator Anthony Bochon. This second legal workshop highlighted that the SSbD recommendation was not meant to cause any change in liability regimes and that it remains until now a voluntary scheme. Whether it could influence the interpretation of the current legal regimes remains uncertain and the future legislation on product safety (already adopted) and product liability (currently under adoption) will have to be carefully watched. The presentations are available below, under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). The recording of the workshop is available in SABYDOMA’s YouTube Channel: SABYDOMA’s 2nd Legal Workshop on S(S)bD Part 1 & Part 2. The agenda can be found here.

Keywords

FOS: Nanotechnology, SSbD, Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design, SbD, Nanoparticles, Nanotechnology, by design, Nanosafety, Workshop, Safe-by-Design, Nanomaterials

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 55
    download downloads 154
  • 55
    views
    154
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
55
154
Green