Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is already transforming industries and has received significant investments from arms-producing economies. This raises serious ethical questions about the military use of artificial intelligence, particularly concerning deploying autonomous lethal weapons systems that operate without human control. Furthermore, ethical concerns surround the ancillary use of AI in military missions, such as target selection and reconnaissance through image analysis. Another critical issue arises from the power asymmetry between arms-producing countries with advanced industries and non-arms-producing countries, particularly those in the Global South. The military utilisation of artificial intelligence reinforces systemic inequalities between developed and developing nations. These demands discussing establishing multilateral mechanisms to regulate the AI arms race among significant powers seeking dominance in disruptive technologies within the military sector. Conversely, countries in the Global South, leveraging their collective economic weight, can advocate for rules and norms in multilateral institutions that address the ancillary use of AI in military missions and prohibit the deployment of AI-powered lethal weapons. The connection between different realities and positions in the international defence system can leverage the capacity to promote agreement development and commitment. This would help reduce power asymmetry and create a more peaceful global scenario.
Artificial Intelligence; autonomous lethal weapons systems; disruptive technologies
Artificial Intelligence; autonomous lethal weapons systems; disruptive technologies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 38 | |
| downloads | 37 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts