Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo...
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Sygma
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

In vitro assessment of skin irritation potential of graphene based materials using reconstructed human epidermis (RhE)

Authors: NATALIA FERNANDEZ PAMPIN; JUAN ANTONIO TAMAYO RAMOS; DASGUPTA, NANDITA; VIVAS, DALIA DE LA FUENTE; GARCIA, ROCIO BARROS; MARTIN, SONIA MARTEL; CUADRADO, LAURA GOMEZ; +1 Authors

In vitro assessment of skin irritation potential of graphene based materials using reconstructed human epidermis (RhE)

Abstract

Graphene-based materials (GBMs) have attracted a lot of attention during the last years due to their extraordinary physicochemical properties. These materials are employed in a wide range of fields, including electronic and biomedical applications1,2,3. From a safety perspective, the major risk for human health associated to these materials is currently related to occupational exposure4, being the inhalation and dermal contact the most relevant routes of exposure to GBMs5. In fact, around 90 % of skin diseases associated with occupational settings are represented by irritant and allergic contact dermatitis6. However, the existing information about cutaneous toxicity of GBMs is scarce. Considering the possible risks in the work environment due to the skin irritation potential of these materials, the present study investigated the cutaneous toxicity of a group of GBMs, including small flakes graphene (SFG), large flakes graphene (LFG) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNplatelets). The inclusion of New Approach Methods (NAMs) for skin sensitization into Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has proved to be a good replacement of animal models. This methodology simulates the human exposure by direct epidermal contact to chemicals. Therefore, to evaluate the skin toxicity, the in vitro EpiDerm Skin Irritation Test (EPI-200-SIT) was employed. Following the OECD Test Nº 439 to determine in vitro skin irritation on reconstructed human epidermis (RhE), it was observed that none of the GBMs caused damage to the tissues. According to EU and Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling Chemicals, GHS, (R38 / Category 2 or no label), an irritant is predicted if the viability of the tissues exposed to the test substance is reduced below 50 % of the viability of the controls. In the case of these GBMs, these materials did not reduce the tissues viability, so they can be considered as non-irritant in the tested conditions. These results provide new insights about the skin irritation potential of GBMs with different properties, demonstrating that the hazard assessment using human in vitro models is a critical aspect to increase the knowledge on their potential impact upon human health. This study is part of the project DIAGONAL (H2020, NMBP-16-2020, Grant Agreement no 953152), which aims to address existing gaps at risk assessment, risk management and risk governance levels providing new knowledge on multicomponent nanomaterials and high aspect ratio nanomaterials.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 40
    download downloads 20
  • 40
    views
    20
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
40
20
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities