User experience with FAIR evaluation tools and services [Webinar]

Authors: Huber, Robert; Mihai, Hannah; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg Andrea; Shepherdson, John; Morris, Matthew; Papagiannopoulos, Kostas; Bach, Janete Saldanha; +2 Authors

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8038722 , 10.5281/zenodo.8038723

User experience with FAIR evaluation tools and services [Webinar]

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

The webinar updated and extended webinar from 2021 on users’ experiences with FAIR evaluation tools and services. Panelists presented their user stories with FAIRness evaluation tests, lessons learned, and recommendations to other Service Providers. For example, recommendations have been offered on steps to take to improve FAIRness evaluation tests scores. New topics were also featured, including: DATICE: The Icelandic Social Science Data Service and an application of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model to PIDs at GESIS.

Related Organizations

University of Iceland
Iceland
University of Bremen
Germany

Keywords

PID, data maturity, research data management, FAIR, evaluation tool

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average