Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are a leading cause of hospitalization and death globally [1]. The early initiation of appropriate antibiotics in patients with LRTI is crucial as postponing effective antibiotic administration can adversely affect the prognosis [2,3]. Therefore, diagnostic studies establishing the microbial etiology of LRTI are fundamental to provide effective therapy and administration of appropriate antibiotics to the patients [4,5]. Currently, antimicrobial therapy of LRTI is typically initiated on an empirical basis, because of the traditional diagnostic methods including standard culture and antigen detection assay are not able to detect significant proportion of causative pathogens [6,7]. In addition, standard culture and antibiotic susceptibility tests are time-consuming processes, which require at least 24-48 hours [8]. It is known that delay in antibiotic administration is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, especially in severe infections such as pneumonia [9]. Over the last few years, molecular techniques have emerged as the diagnostic tool of choice for respiratory microorganisms, particularly for viruses, fastidious bacteria (H. influenza, S. pneumonia etc) with difficulty in growing in culture plates, less viable or present in only small number [4,10]. These molecular techniques are also less likely to be affected by the administered empirical or prior antibiotic than standard culture [11,12]. In addition, molecular techniques are able to detect the causative microorganism more quickly than the standard culture methods and that may expedite the better-targeted antimicrobial treatment and improve the antibiotic stewardship [11,13]. The aim of our study is to evaluate the utility of a comprehensive molecular diagnostic approach encompassing 7 respiratory bacterial and 15 viral pathogens in tracheal aspirate culture in patients with suspected LRTI during intensive care unit (ICU) stay.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 41 | |
| downloads | 45 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts