Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Responsibility for grant approval in RDA TIGER and RDA WG selection for in-kind support lies with the RDA TIGER Selection Committee. This deliverable is a guidance document that sets out the rules of participation that the Committee should follow. It describes the types of funding instruments, rules that the decision making for WGs should follow including defining the selection criteria and role of the Selection Committee. It connects strongly to the work of WP1, the RDA TIGERManagement work package in RDA TIGER who are responsible for the contractual elementsof the grants and budget coordination.
EOSC, RDA,
EOSC, RDA,
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts