Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Subjective Theories about ET

Authors: Döbler, Niklas A.; Raab, Marius; Carbon, Claus-Christian;

Subjective Theories about ET

Abstract

Humans act according to theories. Noteworthy, theories are not only a matter of science. Instead, they structure and permeate virtually every aspect of human life. The Heidelberg Structure-Formation Technique is a qualitative method to visualize so-called subjective theories. It is not limited to a particular area. This technique was, for instance, adapted to gain insights into the needs of palliative care patients or engagement with alternative health measures. The inner logic is that subjective theories guide everyday action and comprise structured and relational beliefs and states of knowledge. Semi-structured interviews are followed by a cooperative theory visualization to clarify these theories. Based on the interview, expert rates try to identify the structure of a subjective theory which is then mirrored to the participant. The participant is now asked to comment and correct this proposal, leading to a harmonized version of the theory proposal. To aid this process, the specific parts of the theories are written down and arranged on paper cards. The result is the theory, expressed with a set of spatially ordered cards that reveal key concepts and underlying relationships. This talk reports findings on subjective theories about extraterrestrial intelligence. Theories of three laypeople reveal patterns of thinking, best described as a mixture of inadmissible and admissible anthropocentrism. Theories were somewhat complex and seriously contemplated the possibility of intelligent life beyond Earth. These findings provide a novel and in-depth perspective into how humans think about extraterrestrials. As the function of these theories is the guidance of action, they can be used to predict human reactions to first contact. Furthermore, they can be used to increase better attune science communication and address potential misconceptions.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Exopsychology, seti, Subjective theories, extraterrestrials

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 61
    download downloads 51
  • 61
    views
    51
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
61
51
Green