Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Using Image Processing and Machine Learning Algorithms for The Detection of Surface Cracks

Authors: Sengul, Fatih; Adem, Kemal;

Using Image Processing and Machine Learning Algorithms for The Detection of Surface Cracks

Abstract

Today, the rapidly growth of cities has made it necessary to following up the performance of infrastructures and architectural works. In developing cities, it is of great importance for human life to follow the deformation of structures over time or materials worn out as a result of disasters. Today, many different methods have been developed for structural deformation evalutaions. In particular, the detection of cracks on material surfaces provides important inferences for performance evaluations. Manual analysis of performance in infrastructure and architectural works does not meet today's needs, both in terms of cost and due to subjective conclusions. Important developments in information technologies ensured that material analysis and audits are carried out objectively and reduced costs to a minimum. Thereby, surface performance analysis by processing images in a computer environment has allowed to obtain higher accuracy results with less cost. In this study, image processing methods were imposed on to analyze surface cracks in materials used in architectural structures and land roads. Surface cracks have been detected by using morphological image processing methods and Hough-line transformation. In order to evaluate the success of these two methods, machine learning methods were used. Comparisons were made using Naive Bayes, Random Forest, Knn and Multi-Layer Perceptron methods, which are machine learning methods for success evaluations. The results gathered as a result of the experiments showed that the Hough-line transform is more successful in extracting features. The highest accuracy was achieved with the Hough-line method, one of the image processing methods, and Random Forest, one of the machine learning methods. It has been successfully classified with an accuracy rate of 97% using Hough-line transformation from image processing methods and Random Forest from machine learning methods to detect cracks on surfaces.

Keywords

Machine learning, hough-line, random forest, image processing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
    download downloads 6
  • 6
    views
    6
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
6
6
Green