Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Dataset Release for MEWL: Few-shot multimodal word learning with referential uncertainty (ICML 2023) GitHub: https://github.com/jianggy/MEWL Abstract: Without explicit feedback, humans can rapidly learn the meaning of words. Children can acquire a new word after just a few passive exposures, a process known as fast mapping. This word learning capability is believed to be the most fundamental building block of multimodal understanding and reasoning. Despite recent advancements in multimodal learning, a systematic and rigorous evaluation is still missing for human-like word learning in machines. To fill in this gap, we introduce the MachinE Word Learning (MEWL) benchmark to assess how machines learn word meaning in grounded visual scenes. MEWL covers human's core cognitive toolkits in word learning: cross-situational reasoning, bootstrapping, and pragmatic learning. Specifically, MEWL is a few-shot benchmark suite consisting of nine tasks for probing various word learning capabilities. These tasks are carefully designed to be aligned with the children's core abilities in word learning and echo the theories in the developmental literature. By evaluating multimodal and unimodal agents' performance with a comparative analysis of human performance, we notice a sharp divergence in human and machine word learning. We further discuss these differences between humans and machines and call for human-like few-shot word learning in machines.
{"references": ["Jiang, G., Xu, M., Xin, S., Liang, W., Peng, Y., Zhang, C., & Zhu, Y. (2023). MEWL: Few-shot multimodal word learning with referential uncertainty. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)."]}
benchmark, ICML, few-shot, concept learning, word learning
benchmark, ICML, few-shot, concept learning, word learning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 74 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts