Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Various research activities rely on citation-based impact indicators. However these indicators are usually globally computed, hindering their proper interpretation in applications like research assessment and knowledge discovery. In this work, we advocate for the use of topic-aware categorical impact indicators, to alleviate the aforementioned problem. In addition, we extend BIP! Services to support those indicators and showcase their benefits in real-world research activities.
5 pages, 2 figures
FOS: Computer and information sciences, open science, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), research assessment, scholarly knowledge graphs, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), Computer Science - Information Retrieval
FOS: Computer and information sciences, open science, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), research assessment, scholarly knowledge graphs, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), Computer Science - Information Retrieval
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 64 | |
| downloads | 24 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts