Downloads provided by UsageCounts
As more commercial airborne gravity gradiometer systems enter the market for exploration, a common method needs to be found to compare the results from each of the systems. While each of the systems has a different design, they all produce the same output tensor data. Two methods will be evaluated as means to estimate precision and accuracy. The odd-even difference technique will be used for the precision analysis and the ground truth technique will be used for the accuracy analysis. The precision of the FTG system using an open-source dataset will be shown to be 9.2E using the odd-even difference technique and the precision of the Falcon system using a comparable open-source dataset will be shown to be 1.9E. The accuracy of the Falcon system will be shown to be 1.39 mGal using the ground truth technique; there was no comparable ground data for the FTG area, so it could not be used.
Open-Access Online Publication: May 29, 2023
accuracy, FTG, AGG., precision, Falcon
accuracy, FTG, AGG., precision, Falcon
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 18 | |
| downloads | 20 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts