Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This study introduces an automated analysis workflow to quantify kidney regeneration over time in the developing zebrafish upon automated laser-induced injury on a screening microscope equipped with a photomanipulation module. The screening dataset consists of multiple time-lapse images of injured and fluorescently labelled distal pronephric tubules of the transgenic Tg(cdh17:egfp) zebrafish line. To overcome the lack of image analysis tools for whole-organism screening data and to automate the quantification of kidney regeneration post photodamage, we developed a workflow combining image-processing and data-analysis using the open-source software tools FIJI, Ilastik and KNIME. Hence, the workflow enables the analysis of regeneration dynamics and facilitates the identification of specimen with impaired or enhanced regeneration. Ultimately, we expect that workflow components can be directly applied for the analysis of other complex timelapse datasets, and can be adapted for the quantification of growth or migration of other fluorescently labelled tissues.
High Content Screening, Timelapse, Regeneration, Laser, Kidney, Zebrafish embryo
High Content Screening, Timelapse, Regeneration, Laser, Kidney, Zebrafish embryo
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 15 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts