Views provided by UsageCounts
A major challenge to the widespread success of augmentative exoskeletons is accurately adjusting the controller to provide cooperative assistance with their wearer. Often, the controller parameters are ``tuned'' to optimize a physiological or biomechanical objective. However, these approaches are resource-intensive, while typically only enabling optimization of a single objective. In reality, the exoskeleton user experience is derived from many factors, including comfort and stability, among others. This work introduces an approach to conveniently tune four parameters of the exoskeleton controller that maximize user preference. We use an evolutionary algorithm to recommend potential parameters, which are ranked by a neural network that is pre-trained with previously collected preference data. The controller parameters that have the highest preference ranking are provided to the exoskeleton, and the wearer provides feedback as forced-choice comparisons. Our approach was able to converge on controller parameters preferred by the wearer compared to randomized parameters with an accuracy of 88% on average. The result indicates that the proposed algorithm was able to identify users' preferences while requiring less than 50 queries to users. This work demonstrates user preference can be used to tune high-dimensional controller spaces easily and accurately, which shows the potential of translating lower-limb wearable technologies into our daily lives.
The data includes subjects' selections of control parameters throughout the experiment. The experiment consists of two sessions, which is the main optimization session and the validation session. The data shows users' selection process between two parameters (parent, offspring), which is composed of exploration / selection, and confirmation of the parameters they preferred throughout the session. There are a total of 13 subjects and each subject went through 3 trials of experiment. The speed of the treadmill was fixed to 1.2 m/s across all subjects. Please see the details of the protocol in the manuscript. The readme.txt describes the content of the data in each Excel file.
Microsoft Excel, PythonFunding provided by: D. Dan and Betty Kahn FoundationAward Number: Funding provided by: X, the moonshot factoryAward Number: Funding provided by: GoogleCrossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006785Award Number:
Exoskeleton, Active Learning, user preference
Exoskeleton, Active Learning, user preference
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts