Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The figure presents a new version of the "Open Science Taxonomy", with 10 first-level facets, subdivided into 96 labels in all, 14 more than the version proposed by the Brazilians, Silveira et al. (2021), and 51 more than the initial version by Pontika et al. (2015). This study was developed through an exploratory research with a deductive approach. The first stage was composed of a review of the taxonomies, with 13 researchers who met weekly for conceptual and epistemological discussions related to Open Science, and methodological and procedural definitions for the study. As a result of the analyses, a taxonomy was developed to be evaluated by more specialists. For this, a questionnaire with open questions about each main axis of the taxonomy was sent to 68 experts. Twenty-one responses were obtained, which cooperated with the modeling and exposure of the terms for the new taxonomy.
The full report of the study that generated this taxonomy of open science is published in the journal Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, available at: DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e91712
Ciencia Abierta - Taxonomía, Comunicação Científica, Representación del Conocimiento, Open Science - Taxonomy, Knowledge Representation, Comunicación Científica, Representação do conhecimento, Unesco, Ciência Aberta - Taxonomia, Scholarly Communication
Ciencia Abierta - Taxonomía, Comunicação Científica, Representación del Conocimiento, Open Science - Taxonomy, Knowledge Representation, Comunicación Científica, Representação do conhecimento, Unesco, Ciência Aberta - Taxonomia, Scholarly Communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 1K | |
| downloads | 282 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts