
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 20.500.14243/492826
Biosensors detect specific bio-analytes by generating a measurable signal from the interaction between the sensing element and the target molecule. Surface acoustic wave (SAW) biosensors offer unique advantages due to their high sensitivity, real-time response capability, and label-free detection. The typical SAW modes are the Rayleigh mode and the shear-horizontal mode. Both present pros and cons for biosensing applications and generally need different substrates and device geometries to be efficiently generated. This study investigates and characterizes ultra-high-frequency (UHF-) SAW resonator biosensors. It reveals the simultaneous presence of the two typical SAW modes, clearly separated in frequency, called slow and fast. The two modes are studied by numerical simulations and biosensing experiments with the glial-fibrillary-acidic-protein (GFAP) biomarker. The slow mode is generally more sensitive to changes in surface properties, such as temperature and mass changes, by a factor of about 1.4 with respect to the fast mode.
shear-horizontal SAW, Biosensors, label-free detection, surface acoustic wave biosensors, Rayleigh mode, Biosensors, surface acoustic wave biosensors, Rayleigh mode, shear-horizontal, SAW, biosensing, label-free, detection sensitivity, finite element modeling, GFAP, biomarker, finite element modeling, biosensing, sensitivity, GFAP biomarker
shear-horizontal SAW, Biosensors, label-free detection, surface acoustic wave biosensors, Rayleigh mode, Biosensors, surface acoustic wave biosensors, Rayleigh mode, shear-horizontal, SAW, biosensing, label-free, detection sensitivity, finite element modeling, GFAP, biomarker, finite element modeling, biosensing, sensitivity, GFAP biomarker
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 9 | |
downloads | 43 |