Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

BioFAIR Final Report

Authors: Technopolis Group; Soranzo, Nicola; Knox, Catherine; Norman, Hannah; Andrews, Robert; Beck, Tim; Micklem, Gos; +4 Authors

BioFAIR Final Report

Abstract

In order to identify and address the Research Data Management needs of UK bioscience researchers, in 2020 UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council (BBSRC), UKRI Medical Research Council (MRC) and Wellcome Trust funded a 9-month study to gather evidence about the adoption of the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) principles, and evaluate the feasibility and impact of the creation of a new UK Institute (tentatively called "BioFAIR") delivering a FAIR Data and Method BioCommons. This is the final report of this feasibility study and has followed the standard business case process in use by UKRI and BEIS. It has been carried out by Technopolis Group in collaboration with ELIXIR-UK (the UK Node of ELIXIR) and has involved a wide-ranging programme of desk research, stakeholder consultations (online researcher surveys and institutional interviews) and a series of deliberative discussions with groups of UKRI funders, the ELIXIR-UK All Hands workshop and the ELIXIR-UK Scientific and Industry Advisory Board. The report is underpinned by a series of analytical presentations and reports, including the results of the online survey, international comparisons and cost-benefit analysis.

Keywords

Digital Research Infrastructure, training, life sciences, productivity, interviews, Community of Practice, capacity building, bioscience, metadata, Research Data Management, Data Stewardship, curation, bioinformatics, artificial intelligence, ELIXIR, UKRI, BioFAIR, BioCommons, open science, survey, e-infrastructure, reproducibility, FAIR

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 228
    download downloads 176
  • 228
    views
    176
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
228
176
Green
Related to Research communities