Downloads provided by UsageCounts
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>In 1818, Samuel L. Mitchill briefly detailed a fossil vertebral column with teeth found in North Carolina. It was believed to have been a sea serpent or giant shark and it was lost in a museum fire in 1866. Its true identity is difficult to ascertain with the sparse information and absence of illustrations. This specimen, dubbed ‘Mitchill’s monster’, is reevaluated here with modern geological and paleontological knowledge. It probably came from the marine, Mio-Pliocene Eastover or Yorktown Formations. It was most likely baleen whale vertebrae with associated teeth of the megatooth shark Otodus megalodon, yet it is also not impossible that both the vertebrae and teeth were O. megalodon. Regardless of which hypothesis is correct, the monster would have been a major discovery.
Megalodon, Otodus
Megalodon, Otodus
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 392 | |
| downloads | 288 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts