Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Landsat Quality Assessment (LTQA)

Authors: Remelgado, Ruben; Carsten, Meyer.; Conrad, Christopher;

Landsat Quality Assessment (LTQA)

Abstract

We developed a suite of quality metrics that characterize the annual and year-to-year frequency of satellite observations, their year-to-year recurrence, and their within-year distribution. These equate the quality of individual observations as reported by the data providers, and limitations to the usability of these data caused by cloud cover. This dataset includes a zip file for each of the following metrics: nrTiles - Number of Landsat tiles used to compute quality metric. imageFrequency - Number of collected images. monthFrequency - Number of months with collected images. maxQuality - Maximum image quality. totalQuality - Number of collected images, weighted by the quality of each image. lastYear - Closest year with usable data, from the start of the time-series to the reference year. distributionBalance - Average of the maximum monthly image quality. distributionQuality - Ratio between the distribution balance of the first and second half of the year. We calculated these quality metrics for each descending tile as drawn in the World Reference System 2 (WRS-2), and for each year. Then, for each year, we combined the tile-specific metrics by averaging them into global grids with a 1-km resolution using the script "map_landsat_quality.py". This was executed in python 3.10. and the associated module requirements are recorded in the file "requirements.txt". All tile-specific metrics, which is an input for the python script, are provided through the file "LTQA_metadata.csv". The calculation of quality metrics is informed by metadata of all unique acquisitions obtained through the Landsat’s bulk metadata service. This considers images acquired with Landsat 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9, but disregards those from Landsat’s Multispectral Scanner System (MSS). The original metadata is provided through the file "LTQA_metadata.zip", which also includes the R code used in the calculation of quality metrics, and a data structure that can be updated to generate new values. We calculated these metrics are calculated annually discounting those unusable due to 100% cloud cover or advanced image degradation.

Keywords

remote sensing, monitoring, sustainable development, landsat, data quality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 23
    download downloads 38
  • 23
    views
    38
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
23
38
Related to Research communities