Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The FORCE11 Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group, in collaboration with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), has developed flowcharts to guide the handling of cases that may arise in relation to the publication of research data. The flowcharts cover the four categories of cases outlined in the Joint FORCE11 & COPE Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group Recommendations: Authorship, Legal, Risk, Rigor.
{"references": ["Puebla, Iratxe, Lowenberg, Daniella, & FORCE11 Research Data Publishing Ethics WG. (2021). Joint FORCE11 & COPE Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group Recommendations. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5391293"]}
open data, ethics, publication ethics, authorship, legal, risk, rigor, flowcharts, FORCE11, COPE
open data, ethics, publication ethics, authorship, legal, risk, rigor, flowcharts, FORCE11, COPE
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 892 | |
| downloads | 906 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts