Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 11250/3109218
Digitalization is a priority for innovation in the engineering sciences. The digital transformation requires making the knowledge claims from scientific research data machine-actionable, so that they can be integrated and analysed with minimal human intervention. Up until now, the depth of digitalization is often too shallow, with annotations that are only of use to a human reader. In addition, digital infrastructures and their metadata standards are tedious to use: They demand too much effort from researchers, much of which goes into metadata that contribute nothing to an improved reuse of knowledge. These shortcomings are related. Data documentation and annotation are complicated and of little use whenever the metadata that make knowledge reusable are not prioritized. Addressing this gap, we discuss metadata standardization efforts targeted at documenting the knowledge status of data; we refer to such an annotation as epistemic metadata. We propose a schema for epistemic metadata, with a focus on knowledge and reproducibility claims, that is designed to be user-friendly and flexible enough to apply to a spectrum of circumstances and validity assessments. These developments are implemented as part of the PIMS-II ontology. They were conducted in line with requirements procured through a case study on papers and claims from molecular modelling and simulation.
applied ontology, epistemic metadata, VDP::Kjemisk prosessteknologi: 562, process data technology, VDP::Chemical process engineering: 562
applied ontology, epistemic metadata, VDP::Kjemisk prosessteknologi: 562, process data technology, VDP::Chemical process engineering: 562
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 46 | |
| downloads | 43 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts