Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The KPAAM-CAM Sociolinguistic Interview Guide (SLIG) is a fieldwork tool used by the members of the KPAAM-CAM project (https://kpaam-cam.org) for the collection of data about / from multilingual speakers in rural areas of Cameroon. Unlike most tools used for this purpose, it includes only minimal stimuli for the elicitation of self-reported language use and, instead, contains a number of stimuli for the discussion of the social networks in which respondents participate. Other than for statistical descriptions of the sample and some basic statistical analyses, the data generated through the SLIG can be used, for example, to populate Geographic Information Systems—thanks to the multiple data points about social networks anchored to real-world locations. The main application of SLIG data in KPAAM-CAM lies in the analysis of spontaneous multilingual behaviors: anyone present in recordings made by project members, be they speakers or by-standers, is in principle expected to respond to the SLIG, so that each recorded interaction can be analyzed on the background of ethnographically and biographically "thick" speaker metadata such as those provided b y the SLIG. The SLIG has been used in research on rural, non-polyglossic multilingualism in Cameroon but can be easily adapted to other contexts where language use is tightly connected with issues of relational identity (see Di Carlo, Esene Agwara, and Ojong Diba 2020, https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.38799, for an introduction to the difference between relational and categorical modes of identification in multilingual behaviors).
{"references": ["Di Carlo, Pierpaolo, Angiachi D. Esene Agwara, and Rachel A. Ojong Diba. 2020. Multilingualism and the heteroglossia of ideologies in Lower Fungom (Cameroon): Use and attitudes. Sociolinguistic Studies, 14, 3:321-45. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.38799", "Di Carlo, Pierpaolo. In press. Reappraising Survey Tools in the Study of Multilingualism: Lessons From Contexts of Small-Scale Multilingualism. Journal of Language Contact, 15, 2: 376-403. doi:10.1163/19552629-15020004"]}
multilingualism, field methods for the study of multilingualism, rural multilingualism, speaker metadata
multilingualism, field methods for the study of multilingualism, rural multilingualism, speaker metadata
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts