Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The scientific publishing process today is by many scientists still considered as non-optimal. Potential improvement areas include the overall publisher business models, the quality and transparency of the review processes, the replicability of scientific experiments, the reputation and informetrics, and other quantifiable and qualitative aspects. Decentralised Ledger Technologies (DLT) have already been used in the context of Decentralised Autonomous Organisations and may contribute to user identification, data and process verification and certification, reputation management and business models based on tokenomics principles. The following study presents the design and the implementation of a Decentralised Autonomous Scientific Publishing Organisation that operates under democratic principles and aims at improving the quality of the scientific publishing processes.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 33 | |
| downloads | 33 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts