Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Three datasets of global monthly gross primary productivity (GPP) during 2003-2018 derived from SIF, NIRv and LAI and their best-matching environmental factors

Authors: Zhao, Weiqing; Zhu, Zaichun;

Three datasets of global monthly gross primary productivity (GPP) during 2003-2018 derived from SIF, NIRv and LAI and their best-matching environmental factors

Abstract

As the largest source of uncertainty in carbon cycle studies, accurate quantification of gross primary productivity (GPP) is critical for the global carbon budget in the context of global climate change. Numerous remote sensing vegetation indices (VIs) have participated in the estimation of global GPP. However, the relative performance of various VIs in estimating GPP and what additional factors should be combined with them to reveal the photosynthetic capacity of vegetation mechanistically better are still poorly understood. We used the Random Forest (RF) algorithm to identify the factors with the most powerful explanation of GPP and to explore the importance of these predictors. We trained six RF models to select features, i.e., two types of models (Plant Functional Type [PFT]-specific and universal) for each vegetation index (SIF, NIRv, and LAI). Each model comprised 100 decision trees, was sampled without replacement, and was trained using 70% of the data. Model performance was evaluated using out-of-bag (OOB) R-squared (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) values. The predictor with the lowest importance score in the iteration was removed and the whole procedure was then repeated until only the vegetation index, CO2, and PFTs were left. The predictors used to estimate GPP were identified based on the performance curve of OOB R2 and RMSE. The determination of the model is based on the principle that further reductions in the number of predictors would considerably reduce model performance, while increasing the number of predictors would not significantly improve model performance. Here we provide a set of high-spatial resolution (1/12°) global gridded products of monthly GPP for 2003-2018 generated for each vegetation index based on a generic model with an optimal configuration, i.e., an optimal combination of VI and other relevant variables using the RF algorithm. R2 of three optimal VI-based GPP estimation models ranges from 0.84 to 0.85, and RMSE ranges from 1.51g C·m−2·d−1 to 1.54g C·m−2·d−1. More information about the datasets can be found in Zhao and Zhu (2022) Remote Sensing. Zhao W, Zhu Z. Exploring the Best-Matching Plant Traits and Environmental Factors for Vegetation Indices in Estimates of Global Gross Primary Productivity[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(24): 6316.

{"references": ["Zhao W, Zhu Z. Exploring the Best-Matching Plant Traits and Environmental Factors for Vegetation Indices in Estimates of Global Gross Primary Productivity[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(24): 6316."]}

Related Organizations
Keywords

machine learning, leaf area index, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, gross primary productivity, NIRv

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 56
    download downloads 20
  • 56
    views
    20
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
56
20