Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Pseudophlepsius ferganensis Dubovsky 1966

Authors: Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu.;

Pseudophlepsius ferganensis Dubovsky 1966

Abstract

Pseudophlepsius ferganensis Dubovsky, 1966 (Figs. 72–73) This taxon is known to us only by the original description. Since it was published in Russian, here we provide its translation with comments in square brackets. “Smaller and slenderer than previous [i.e., P. binotatus], pale colored species. Main body coloration ash gray. Pattern similar to that of P. comma Hpt. [= P. binotatus], but less dense and paler. Differs well from it in aedeagus structure. Lateral lobes of aedeagus ribbon-shaped in lateral view, with protrusion in upper half on dorsal side; their apices angularly pointed, not elongated. Dorsal process straight, fingershaped, smoothly pointed. Pygofer lobe process short, spiny. Body length: ♁, 5.0– 5.2 mm; ♀, 6.2 mm. Uzbekistan, central Ferghana, Yazyavan Steppe between Khamzaabad and Yazyavan, four males, one female, two nymphs from Alhagi in dune sands, 8. VII. 1963 ”. For comparison, Dubovsky (1966) gives a drawing of the aedeagus of P. binotatus with elongated apices (Fig. 71). In fact, P. ferganensis does not differ from P. binotatus in the body length and only slightly if ever differs from it in the shape of aedeagus stem apices, since in P. binotatus their shape is highly variable. Still, it differs distinctly from P. binotatus by straight and smoothly pointed basal processes of aedeagus (Fig. 72). The shape of style is the same as in P. binotatus (Fig. 73). Eremophlepsius and Pseudophlepsius are closely related taxa. Emelyanov (1977) and Mityaev (2002, 2015) consider them to be synonyms and include P. binotatus into Eremophlepsius; in Emelyanov (1977), Pseudophlepsius is treated as a separate subgenus. Still, Emelyanov (1999) and Zahniser & Dietrich (2013) consider them separate genera. Indeed, these two taxa distinctly differ in the shape of the subgenital plates and styles, whereas within each taxon their shape is similar. Possibly, molecular analysis can be used to more accurately determine their rank.

Published as part of Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu., 2023, Contributions to the study of the subtribe Eremophlepsiina Dmitriev, 2002 (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Opsiini), pp. 573-583 in Zootaxa 5270 (3) on page 582, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5270.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/7863579

Keywords

Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Insecta, Arthropoda, Pseudophlepsius, Animalia, Biodiversity, Pseudophlepsius ferganensis, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 1
  • 1
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
1