Views provided by UsageCounts
Figure 2. The lateral region in fixed specimens of some species of Cophomantini: A, Hypsiboas pulchellus (). B, Hypsiboas raniceps (). C, Bokermannohyla pseudopseudis (). D, Hypsiboas albopunctatus (). E, Aplastodiscus perviridis (). F, Aplastodiscus perviridis (). G, Hypsiboas heilprini (). H, Hypsiboas punctatus (; Brunetti et al., 2012). A, B, lateral regions in species lacking sexually dimorphic skin glands (SDSGs). C, D, lateral regions in species in which SDSGs are discernible only after histological analysis. Note that, in A–D, variation in the colour and structure of the skin is independent of the occurrence of SDSGs. E, F, the lateral gland in most cases is discernible only upon careful comparison between males (E) and females (F). E, G, H, in those cases in which it is macroscopically evident, the gland presents two different morphologies: slightly distinct skin yellowish or cream-coloured, with individual glands visible under high magnification (E, G), or pale yellow individual glands clearly distinguished without magnification (H). Note that the gland limits are often difficult to define macroscopically; broken lines indicate the putative limits of the glandular area. Scale bars = 5 mm. (Colour version of figure available online.)
Published as part of Brunetti, A. E., Hermida, G. N., Luna, M. C., Barsotti, A. M. G., Jared, C., Antoniazzi, M. M., Rivera-Correa, M., Berneck, B. V. M. & Faivovich, J., 2015, Diversity and evolution of sexually dimorphic mental and lateral glands in Cophomantini treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae: Hylinae), pp. 12-34 in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 114 on page 17, DOI: 10.1111/bij.12406, http://zenodo.org/record/7848532
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts