Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Identifying the case for next generation energy performance certificates

Authors: Jenkins, David; Semple, Sally; McCallum, Peter;

Identifying the case for next generation energy performance certificates

Abstract

The 2003 Energy Performance in Buildings Directive (EPBD) resulted in EU member states formulating standardised responses to grading and assessing the energy performance of their building stock. The 2018 update of the EPBD raised the possibility of using Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) for new metrics and applications, placing the challenge of upgrading our built environment under greater scrutiny. This includes attempting to quantify the “smartness” of buildings, as gauged by a “Smart Readiness Indicator”, but it also raises the question of where EPCs should go next – and, by extension, what can we reliably do with current EPC frameworks across Europe? Can new challenges, and targets, of a decarbonised building stock be met within the current scope of EPCs? The €2M Horizon2020 crossCert project aims to test a sample of buildings across Europe using the responses of different countries to the EPBD. In doing so, the project will i) identify differences in approaches to EPC assessment, ii) report on the impact of these differences for the same building sample, iii) use this analysis to propose new, “next generation” EPC approaches and iv) test out these new approaches with target user groups to better understand their potential. This study will document the current variations of EPC frameworks across Europe and compare those with proposed next-generation EPC approaches from a range of European projects, including the above. To understand the argument for a different approach, this research will reflect on the changes that have occurred since the EPBD was first introduced, including improved access to high-performance building simulation and empirical energy data, new (e.g., heating) technologies reaching mass market, and the requirement of these simple energy rating calculations to enforce mandatory action, rather than provide advisory guidance.

Related Organizations
Keywords

EPC, Energy Performance Certificates

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 22
    download downloads 23
  • 22
    views
    23
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
22
23
Green