Downloads provided by UsageCounts
pmid: 38061196
pmc: PMC10703497
Abstract Identifying cell types is crucial for understanding the functional units of an organism. Machine learning has shown promising performance in identifying cell types, but many existing methods lack biological significance due to poor interpretability. However, it is of the utmost importance to understand what makes cells share the same function and form a specific cell type, motivating us to propose a biologically interpretable method. CellTICS prioritizes marker genes with cell-type-specific expression, using a hierarchy of biological pathways for neural network construction, and applying a multi-predictive-layer strategy to predict cell and sub-cell types. CellTICS usually outperforms existing methods in prediction accuracy. Moreover, CellTICS can reveal pathways that define a cell type or a cell type under specific physiological conditions, such as disease or aging. The nonlinear nature of neural networks enables us to identify many novel pathways. Interestingly, some of the pathways identified by CellTICS exhibit differential expression “variability” rather than differential expression across cell types, indicating that expression stochasticity within a pathway could be an important feature characteristic of a cell type. Overall, CellTICS provides a biologically interpretable method for identifying and characterizing cell types, shedding light on the underlying pathways that define cellular heterogeneity and its role in organismal function. CellTICS is available at https://github.com/qyyin0516/CellTICS.
Machine Learning, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Problem Solving Protocol, Cluster Analysis, Neural Networks, Computer, Single-Cell Analysis, Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis
Machine Learning, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Problem Solving Protocol, Cluster Analysis, Neural Networks, Computer, Single-Cell Analysis, Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts